The first sequel in the Transporter franchise obeys all of the rules of sequels – bigger budget, bigger death count, more gloss, and at least one more lingerie-clad hottie with two handheld machine guns. It’s otherwise exactly the same movie as the original, with a few negligible plot modifications. What isn’t changed is the ready-made action movie premise, this time using such an old action cliché that the first thing I thought of was those little sponge-things I used to make my mom buy me when I was a kid. You put a drop of water on it and in a couple minutes it turns into a dinosaur or something.
But beyond the just-add-water premise, it at least ultimately proves to be another example of the uniquely entertaining over-the-top action extravaganza that the series has come to be known for. The movie works because it knows not to take itself seriously, and while this also prohibits anyone in the audience from being in danger of taking anything seriously, it doesn’t stop it from being fun.
There is a scene in the movie, for example, where Frank notices a bomb strapped to the underside of his car, and when I saw the way he managed to dislodge it I laughed out loud, and not necessarily in a bad way. You will laugh too, but there is a distinct feeling that you’re laughing with the movie and not at it, and that’s why it works.
Frank Martin has been doing some chauffeuring duties for the wealthy Billings family – Jefferson, who works in drug control for the government, and his estranged wife Audrey – and ends up making an unlikely friendship with their 6-year-old son Jack.
But don’t worry, the unlikeliness of that friendship soon begins to look very normal when compared to the rest of the plot developments. Jack is kidnapped by a stereotypical Colombian villain and his henchmen, which include his statuesque blonde girlfriend (who spends the entire movie wearing nothing but skimpy lingerie and a ton of eyeshadow) and a bunch of meathead henchmen.
So get this, the villain, like me, is Colombian, so of course he’s hell-bent on flooding the world with drugs, but wait until you hear his plan! His scheme is to infect Jack with a deadly airborne virus that will in turn infect anyone who comes into contact with him. But it turns out that they don’t even want a ransom, they hand the kid back with amazingly little resistance (in one of the movie’s dumbest scenes). The kid is left in a paddywagon, where the police fear there might be a bomb. The mother, worried that the boy will suffocate, throws caution to the wind and rushes in to rescue him herself.
I didn’t know you could suffocate in the back of the truck, but no matter. This is, believe it or not, not the stupidest thing that the mother says in the movie.

Once again, Frank proves remarkably adept at tying his opponents up with their own clothes and, you know, handy firehoses and such...
When explaining the boy’s plight a little while later, Frank explains to her, “Jack’s been infected with a deadly virus, Audrey. Now anyone who comes into contact with him will die.” Audrey: “What are you telling me? Are you telling me my son’s gonna die?”
Ok, maybe I’m nitpicking, but really it all adds to the amusement of the whole movie. I love these What are you saying?? moments.
So anyway, we learn that anyone that Jack breathes on will be infected with this deadly virus, and his father Jefferson is soon attending a conference with lots of high-level officials involved in the United States drug control infrastructure. You see where this is going?
I hope so, because while the plot is actually a little more complex than you would expect from a movie like this, it doesn’t slow down for very long to give you time to think about anything, which I suppose is just as well. It moves frantically from one action set piece to the next, balancing out the preposterous action sequences with greater emotional involvement than the original movie in the relationship between Jack and Frank.
But when it comes down to it, The Transporter 2 is exactly the same thing as the original movie. It has all the same ingredients but in slightly different quantities, so your opinion of the first movie is going to give you a much better idea of how you’ll like the second one than any review is going to. Then again, something tells me that a good portion of the Transporter target audience aren’t big readers, so maybe I’m wasting my time here anyway?
Nah, I’m just kidding. That’ll be my bad joke for the day. But regardless of the reading habits of the Transporter fan club, I don’t need to explain to you that this is not meant to be an intelligent action movie. It’s a super-fast action thriller with stunts that would make James Bond blush and a lot of people shooting each other up, but I would be lying if I said it wasn’t entertaining…








