View All Categories

Celebrities: Brad PittCategories: Movie Reviews, MoviesEvents: OscarsTags: Benjamin Button, Cate Blanchett, drama, Movie Reviews, Movies

A Curious Review of Benjamin Button

The term "second childishness" comes from the 'Seven Ages of Man' speech ("All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players...") in Shakespeare's play As You like It. Shakespeare describes the earliest part of life as "the infant, mewling and puking in the nurse's arms," and ends his summary with "the last scene of all, that ends this strange eventful history, is second childishness and mere oblivion...."

I was reminded of this short phrase while I was watching The Curious Case of Benjamin Button because so much of the film's story is based on the chronological passing of life and the stages that we go through as we pass from birth to death. And I wonder about its significance, as well, because there is a key character in the movie who, at one point, recites Shakespeare.

It's a curious premise that gives us the foundation for the movie - Benjamin Button was born with a peculiar disease. He's nearly blind, his hands and feet are calcified and useless, and his skin looks like he has third degree burns covering every surface of his body. His mother died during childbirth, and his distraught father abandons the monstrous child on the steps of a nearby home.

Thankfully, the people who live there take him in and raise him as one of their own, and he lives and lives and lives years beyond the doctors' sad predictions. You see, Benjamin has a disease where he is born with the decayed body of a man in his 80's, and they are sure that his time will come at any moment, but as he

[caption id="attachment_20378" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Taraji P. Henson as Queenie, Benjamin's adoptive mother."]Taraji P. Henson as Queenie, Benjamin's adoptive mother.[/caption]

gets a few years older, it becomes apparent that his body is growing younger.

There is a real disease that's somewhat similar to the one afflicting Benjamin in the movie. I'm not sure what it's called, but basically what happens is the aging process is wildly accelerated, so a 7 or 10-year-old boy, for example, would be wheelchair-bound and losing sight and hearing and memory and suffering all of the other unpleasantries of entering the advanced stages of life.

Benjamin's predicament is sort of a slightly altered version of this disease, combined with the fascinating story arc of Daniel Keyes' brilliant novel "Flowers For Algernon," which is about a mentally challenged young man named Charlie who volunteers for a scientific experiment to increase his intellectual capacity. Like a mouse subject before him, his intelligence slowly begins to increase, and then increases with astonishing speed, bringing his level of intellect beyond even the most accomplished scientists involved with the experimentation and ultimately leaving him feeling as intellectually isolated as he did before the experiment even began. Unfortunately, it soon becomes apparent that Algernon, the mouse, is beginning to lose his intelligence, and Charlie suffers painfully through a slow mental descent as his cognitive functioning begins to deteriorate.

[caption id="attachment_20377" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Benjamin at about age 7. And yes, that's Brad Pitt playing him. The visual effects team for this movie definitely deserves some recognition."]Benjamin at about age 7. And yes, that's Brad Pitt playing him. The visual effects team for this movie definitely deserves some recognition.[/caption]

It's a wonderful story, and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button in many ways bears close resemblance, although the movie veers much more sharply into the world of fantasy than the book did.

It's told almost entirely through the reading of Benjamin's diary, which a young woman is reading to an old woman on her deathbed at the beginning of the movie. The old woman is Daisy (Cate Blanchett), and the young woman is Caroline (Julia Ormond). Daisy is dying, and she wants to hear her daughter's voice as much as possible, so she asks her to read the diary of this Benjamin Button, of whom Caroline has never heard but who's life has been in some way intertwined with her mothers for many decades.

The similarities to Forrest Gump are unmistakable and understandable, since it was Eric Roth that wrote both movies. Benjamin is an outcast from society and his life is juxtaposed with major historical events, and he has a charming curiosity and demeanor that makes him immediately likable. Roth has taken the basic premise of the story of the same name written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but the similarities are surprisingly rare. For one thing, the movie is a much darker, more serious exploration of life than the story, which was more of an intelligent but farcical comedic romp. The kind of thing Dr. Seuss might have had a wonderful time toying with.

I should mention that even though it's a fantasy film, many people will have trouble accepting the premise. We can accept it for the sake of enjoying and understanding the story, but the problem is that Benjamin's reverse-aging process is too one-dimensional. When he's a kid, he's just an old man, and when he grows older, he appears in the vibrant height of his 20s, rather than a tortured soul who has to pass through life alone, or know that soon he will lose the ones he loves. There is never a sense that there is someone at a different stage of life trapped beneath whatever exterior we see at any given time.

But essentially the movie is about not only the way that people pass through life, but the way people pass through life affecting each other. In one of the film's most interesting segments, Benjamin, through his diary, tells a complex story of different people, all strangers, going through a certain portion of their day, and all of their actions are affected by a huge number of different variables, all of them ultimately affecting each other in some way, and the result of their actions is that Daisy gets hit by a car, instantly ending her successful dancing career. Benjamin notes with some amazement that if a single one of all of those people had done a single thing differently, altering their motion by even one second, the accident would have been avoided and all of the rest of Daisy's life would have been completely different.

Personally, I was a little more amazed at how he knew all of the details about what all those strangers were doing at that particular time on that particular day, but no matter. It's standard chaos theory, which resonates deeply within the film.
"We're all going to the same place, we're just taking different roads to get there."

It's important to realize that this is a fairy tale, however, because once you do that, it's much easier to see the film's meaning and to allow the characters' experiences attempt to bring some understanding to some of life's more difficult inevitabilities by introducing us to a man who experiences the same things but experiences them totally differently. There are a couple moments when the movie comes dangerously close to being openly preachy with its message, but it's packed with spectacular performances and overall it's a visually stunning and genuinely engaging character drama.

The Bean-Meter!

Bean gives the movie 4 1/2 out of 5 beans, and that's not at all bad. He's still confused, however, about where Benjamin's body weight actually went as he turned into a kid at the end of the movie. He has one theory, but trust me, you don't want to hear it...
Click to 'Heart This' Article
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on MySpaceShare on StumbleUponShare on DiggShare on DeliciousShare on RedditShare through E-Mail

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
  • Jennifer  said:
    3 years ago (January 31, 2009 - 7:45pm) 0 Votes

    Deeply moving a bit creepy at times but nonetheles, a thought provokin story. Tt does require the audience to suspend belief which most of us are willing to do...provided we care about the characters. I felt that the Characters were very one dimensional and lacked the volnerability to pull off the depth needed for a movie like this. Brad's character required a sensitivity that he just doesn't have. Leonardo De Caprio probably could have done the role more justice. There were too many similatities to Forrest Gump. You had the tug boat captain (Forrest had the shrimp boat captain) and the in and out of his life love interest (Daisy) much like Forrest Gump's love interest Jenny. The difference is... that Lutenant Dan (the shrimp boat captain in Forrest Gump) was a much more genuine character and far more charasmatic than the drunken tug boat captain in Benjamin Buttons. Also, did i mention this movie was 3 hours long!! I wouldn't see it again... but the subtle beauty and messages about Life were worth it..

  • Kristen  said:
    3 years ago (January 31, 2009 - 7:57pm) 0 Votes

    Yes I agree-- Brad doesn't have the depth to play this kind of character. it's a little out of his range as an actor. He pulled it off but a more sophisticated actor may have been able to embrace the role and volnerability of a character like this. Also there aren't any trips to the doctor or any specialists to explore his condition....with the exception of one doctor in the begining of the movie who claims he looks like an eighty year old man and then exits the room. Suspension of belief is a MUST for this movie... but the movie has alot of holes in it. How come you never see him make one entry into his diary... which is being read by the young lady throughout the entire movie? Fantasy movies are great.. E.T. was a fantasy too..but even E.T. was more believable than Brad Pitt!

  • Jon  said:
    3 years ago (February 1, 2009 - 7:55pm) 0 Votes

    I agree that the movie was a bit long and did have a couple of holes in its story, however despite the flaws, If you can come to appreciate the beauty of the story its truely a moving story, and has re-evaluating your life, this movie really made me cry, and ashamed as a man to say I enjoyed every bit of this movie, and I respectfully disagree in regards to brad's depth, the role extremely extensive in summing up 80 years of a mans life, I just cant imagine anyone else putting forth a better performance for the role.

    P.S. I hope Brad and this movie wins many awards as I was disapointed about the golden globe awards regarding this movie.

  • Play the Hollywire Oscars Contest! | Hollywire.com  said:
    3 years ago (February 17, 2009 - 4:35am) 0 Votes

    [...] it’s just going to be a popularity contest. And given that the wonderful but unspectacular film Benjamin Button has been nominated in a whopping 13 categories this year, the latter is looking [...]

  • Metesigeoke  said:
    2 years ago (October 25, 2009 - 9:26am) 0 Votes
  • Russell Crowe and Ridley Scott Gladiating again - ‘Robin Hoo  said:
    2 years ago (May 23, 2010 - 10:04pm) 0 Votes

    [...] to make another Robin Hood movie, a team involving the likes of Ridley Scott, Russell Crowe, and Cate Blanchett would resemble something that I might have hand-picked myself, but I have such a deep-seated love [...]

  • Post new comment

    6 Comments Show Newest FirstShow More
    Cancel

Daechelle Takes You to the Grand Opening of Dekoposh!
Need celeb news now? We've got you covered. Stay connected... JOIN HOLLYWIRE your insider Hollywood connection Connect with Facebook