Emma Watson

Emma Watson will only get naked for Bernardo Bertolucci [CelebNewsWire]

Jennifer Aniston: Enough Of The Press! Funny? We Are Still Talkin’ About Her!  GossipGirls]

The Real Natasha Bedingfield [CelebsGoneGood]

Hillary Duff Candids and Some Butt Shots!  [Glamzilla]

Jayde Nicole: Playmate turned Author  [Celebrity-Gossip]

David Beckham Bungee Jumping in New Zealand [thelifefiles]

Although Emma Watson has been busy filming Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, she does not stop pursuing intellectual fulfillment.

Watson received three A’s in her ‘A’ level exams: three A’s in English Literature, History of Art and Geography.  Her high scores meet the admission requirements of Cambridge University, but Watson revealed that she applied for several American universities and would consider studying the liberal arts major as an undergrad if she decided to continue her education in the U.S.  If she chose to stay in the United Kingdom, she would major in English Literature.

Unlike many Hollywood stars who give up the chance of education for their career, Watson is clearly trying to maintain the balance between school and work.  Her choice of pursuing a university degree definitely shows that she plans carefully for her future and sets herself apart from some “troubled” celebrities, such as Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton, whose typical activities mainly include drinking and night clubs.  It is very likely that Watson will have a more promising career than those whose brains are empty but filled with alcohol.

Emma Watson has reportedly signed a six million dollar deal with Chanel.

Emma will be replacing Keira Knightley, who’s contract with Chanel expires this summer.  A source told British newspaper The Mail that,

Emma has been slowly integrated into the Chanel brand.  They have been dressing her for film premieres and parties over recent months to see if she is the right fit.  Once it became clear that she is growing into a beautiful young women and wears the Chanel brand so elegantly, they had to sign her up.

Emma has come a long way since her acting debut as Hermione in the Harry Potter films.  She will be a nice addition to Chanel.

Emma Watson, best known as Hermione from Harry Potter,  has landed a new role.  She will be playing the part of Betsy, a young noblewomen that has been trapped on the island of St. Helena were Napoleon was exiled to, in the new drama Napoleon and Betsy.                                                                           The part was originally intended for Scarlett Johansson but since the movie is somewhat of a true story and Betsy was only 13 when she met Napoleon the filmmakers decided to cast a younger actress.  Johansson will still co-produce the film.                                                                                            Filming for Napoleon and Betsy will begin this fall and will have to work around Emma’s filming of Harry Potter.

Emma Watson, who plays Hermione in the Harry Potter films, turned 18 on Tuesday and received access to the $20 million fortune she’s earned acting in the HP movies.

Apparently, Watson has a good set of parents because rumors are that they insisted she sit through a series of lessons in money management given by Coutts Bank (who also advise the Queen of England) in hopes that she’ll learn a thing or two and won’t blow through all that cash like some others we know…..
Think she’ll buy a Bentley like Kim Kardashian or a Rolls like Eddie Murphy just bought for their birthdays?

If you are wondering what her pal Harry Potter, Daniel Radcliffe, is worth… It’s an estimated $48 million!

It’s sure profitable to be a wizard these days!

The final Harry Potter book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, will be made into two movies. The Part I  is set to be released in November of 2010 and Part II will follow six months later in May 2011.

Melissa Anelli, Webmistress of the leading fan blog, The Leaky Cauldron, says that this idea is “hugely positive.”

“This has been rumored for a long time, and even the rumor was getting fans excited in a good way,” Anelli wrote in an email Wednesday. “The fans’ number one complaint with the movies always has been that there isn’t enough time to give the rich detail and colorful characterizations in the work the full berth to flourish…Now we can have some time for that without losing some of the most beautiful scenes in the whole series.”

Longtime Potter producer David Heyman expressed a similar sentiment to the Times saying, “I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons. Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book.”

As planned, Anelli wrote, “it’s a rare win-win-win situation—[Warners] gets to honor the spirit of the books, the fans get more detail and a better product, and the extra profits from a second film not only make it possible, but preferable, to the studio.”

Daniel Radcliffe, the boy who has racked up 10 years playing the infamous Harry Potter agrees, “I think it’s the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book.”

One big decision still awaits, though. As Heyman told the Times, “The question will be, where do you break [the two movies]?…Do you break [them] with a moment of suspense or one of resolution?”
I am very, very excited about this decision. I am a huge Harry Potter fan. I’ve seen the movies too many times to count. I am so sad there is no more after this. But splitting the book up into two movies definitely makes me happy, the more Potter the better.