Tag Archive | "Kirsten Dunst"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Anne Hathaway To Play ‘Black Cat’

Posted on 19 November 2009 by Kat

Anne Hathaway has just been offered a role in a major film franchise! The former Princess Diaries and  The Devil Wears Prada star has been asked to play the role of the villainous Black Cat in the majorly anticipated fourth Spider-Man installment.

anne-hathaway

Hathaway earned herself an Oscar nod for the indie-flick Rachel Getting Married in 2008.

As of recent, Rachel McAdams and Julia Stiles have also been linked to Spider-Man 4.

The film, also starring Toby Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, is set to open in May 2011.

Comments (2)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday’s Hot Links

Posted on 23 August 2009 by Lexacahn

whale_billboard

PETA Hates Fat People [CollegeCandy]

BET’s Michael Jackson Special Airs Tonight [TV.com]

Bisexual Vampires on True Blood? [AskMen]

George Clooney Breaks His Hand [PopCrunch]

Mariah Carey’s Perfume Ad [Celebrilarity]

Kirsten Dunst Relapses [AllieIsWired]

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Celebrities At The MET Costume Institute Gala 2009 (Photos)

Posted on 05 May 2009 by Tammy Cakes

Last night a carpet full of your favorite celeb women showed up for the 2009 Costume Institute Gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.  Some wore fabulous designer gowns and looked absolutely stunning, like Jessica Biel and Elizabeth Hurley, while others wore simple blah dresses you see at clubs, like Gisele Bundchen and Rachel Bilson.  But it’s between Tyra Banks, Rihanna, and Madonna who had the most shocking look of the night.  Tyra looked flawless, except for her hairdo, which looked like a birds nest.  Yeah, I don’t know what she was thinking with that one.  Rihanna sported a Dolce & Gabbana black suit, white shirt, and bow tie.  I’ll give her credit for the attempt and the amazing makeup job, but not a big fan of the outfit.  And Madonna just looked like a mess!  From her ugly black boots to her mop on top hair. What is that green twisty thing in her hair?! It is hideous and she looks like a clown!  I think she wins for worst dressed of the night.

Which celeb style is your favorite?

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

More Thursday Hot Gossip

Posted on 13 November 2008 by Travis Snyder

Christina Milian

Christina Milian

Christina Milian is Low Key  [the.Life.files]

Caution! Jonas Brother’s tearjerker  [CelebsGoneGood]

NBC cancels Lipstick Jungle [celebridiot]

Kirsten Dunst-Grabbing tits in bikini  [glamzilla]

NYC Against Proposition 8 (aka Prop Hate)   [popbytes]

Miley Cyrus: Bad Tattoo Enabler  [CelebNewsWire]

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Dude finally cleans up! – ‘How To Lose Friends and Alienate People’ review…

Posted on 10 October 2008 by Michael DeZubiria

Simon Pegg plays the part of Sidney Young, a young entertainment writer who has begun the beginnings of a career writing for a grassroots magazine that specializes in badmouthing the shallowness and superficiality of the rich and famous. He is making a career out of lampooning celebrities, although he has a desperate wish to be a celebrity himself. The movie is based on the very bizarre career of Toby Young, who also ran  a small magazine in Britain called the Modern Review, which offered scathing criticism of pretty much everything imaginable, until he closed the magazine in a hail of verbal bullets with his co-editor, and then went on to a spectacularly failed career as a writer for Vanity Fair, which is pretty much the part of his life told in this movie.

He is at first thrilled to go work for a major publication (called Sharp’s Magazine in the movie), and despite active nerves he is positively beaming on his first day. He meets the chief editor, Clayton Harding (played by Jeff Bridges), who is hard as nails but who is also exactly the kind of editor he needs to be for a goof-off like Young to keep his job at the magazine. He offers little in the form of immediate acceptance of Young, but he also has what can only be described as a liberal tolerance of Young’s off-the-wall antics and inappropriate behavior.

Much of the comedy in the movie is derived from Young’s misunderstanding of or indifference to the generally accepted code of public behavior and the peculiar etiquette involved in dealing with the rich and famous. But Sidney’s reasons for acting in such a weird way and for giving outwardly offensive interviews is because he believes that he loathes the entire celebrity culture and, it would seem, he believes in that age-old saying – ‘If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em…and THEN beat ‘em.”

Complicating matters are two very different women. There is a charming, regular girl at the magazine named Alison Olsen (Kirsten Dunst) who at first is appalled by Sidney’s obvious arrogance and womanizing ways, and a stunning model named Sophie (Megan Fox), who represents the celebrity culture. Needless to say, Sidney’s endless attack of superficiality and stardom is a superficial lust for Sophie, the one with the look of a star.

Sophie is stunningly beautiful, it’s true, but also comes across as having not a single thought rattling around in her head, and she’s a talentless actress nominated for Best Actress for starring in a god-awful movie (of course, movies-within-movies are always pretty awful). Alison is a regular girl, not very interesting or attractive, but Dunst’s performance makes her a real person. A relationship with her would have all the reality and depth of a Britney Spears marriage, and yet the movie retains some level of believability because, despite how obvious this is, we also feel Sidney’s pain in not pursuing her (I felt it, anyway).

How To Lose Friends and Alienate People has a pretty interesting premise and is full of honest, satisfactory performances, and although it turns into a bit of your standard romantic comedy by the third act, it has a variety of well-developed and interesting characters. Danny Huston, for example, gives us a great performance as Alison’s other love interest, who pays homage to The Big Lebowski (also starring Bridges) with his ever-present White Russian, one of my personal favorite drinks. Buying Absolut and Kahlua here in China costs the equivalent of about $350, but my kitchen is never without them.

I am looking forward to the day when Simon Pegg will branch out a little bit, because I love his films but I am completely unsure about his range. He played a serious character in Hot Fuzz, but only serious in relation to the lunacy surrounding him, and ultimately went back to being himself again, which he has pretty much been in Shaun of the Dead, Run, Fat Boy, Run, and now How To Lose Friends and Alienate People. He’s a rising star, it will be interesting to see what else he can do.

The Bean Meter

3.5 Beans out of 5.

3.5 Beans out of 5.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Dun-Lo an Item? Is Kirsten Dunst and Justin Long going out?

Posted on 17 July 2008 by ksouthall

Kirsten Dunst     Justin Long

It is rumored that Mac man Justin Long is hooking up with Kirsten Dunst.  On the heels of his break up with Drew Barrymore and already going for it?  Alright.

A source says that they are friends and Kristen is consoling him while he is working through his recent break up.  However, according to an eye witness report for OK Magazine, they were spotted getting very cozy.

“Justin was holding Kirsten’s hand while walking around downtown NYC in the SoHo area,” an eyewitness tells OK!. “They stayed out all night and Kirsten was all over him and kept leaning in to kiss him.”

I guess it is like known that Kirsten has had a little crush on Justin for a while.

Who wouldn’t?!  He is super cute.  Funny guys always are.

Justin Long

Comments (2)

Tags: , ,

Kirsten Dunst Treated for Depression, Not Drugs

Posted on 28 May 2008 by ksouthall

Kirsten Dunst

 

Kirsten Dunst explains her stint at Cirque Lodge treatment center in Utah was for depression and not for drugs, as the rumors would have you believe. Kirsten stated that she is better place now and is able to speak out, where as before when she was in treatment she kept silent because she couldn’t talk about it. She is saying a whole lot now!

I was struggling, and I had the opportunity to go somewhere and take care of myself. I was fortunate to have the resources to do it. My friends and family thought it was a good idea, too. But I didn’t know where to go. My doctor recommended Cirque Lodge. There’s been a lot of misrepresentation about what is going on in my life, and this has been very painful for my friends and family.

The starlet had waited 6 months before seeking help and her doctor was the one that recommended the treatment center in Utah made famous by treating Lindsay Lohan last year. Kirsten says that first and foremost she wants the world to know that celebrities are not different than anyone else and that “we are all in the same boat.” Depression can affect anyone.

Best of wishes Ms. Dunst, for continued health and getting the help you need.Kirsten Dunst

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

Kirsten Has It All… Including Alcohol Addiction

Posted on 09 February 2008 by Cindy

Next to join in on Celebrity Rehab Circus is Kirsten Dunst!! Our cute Mary Jane Watson has a drinking problem. Dunst also lovingly known as “Kirsten Drunkst” in certain social circles is headed off to Utah to check in to Cirque Lodge. (You may remember that name as it is the same center Lilo checked into…. and now Eva Mendes)

Kirsten Dunst

Oh, what fun group therapies they must be having in Utah. Well we all know how sobriety is working out for Lindsay…. all I have to say is Good LUCK Kirsten.

Kirsten Dunst 2

Dunst has been seen at Chateau Marmont and Roosevelt Hotel getting drunk constantly. Rumour has it that she went down hill after she broke up with long time boyfriend and hottie Jake Gyllenhal. Uh… yeah. I’d drink myself into oblivion too… Oh well Kirsten, you can sleep at night knowing that you’re winning. Oh wait… no. He’s dating Natalie Portman and you’re going to rehab… yeah…

Natalie Portman and Jake Gyllenhaal

Comments (2)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Life is but a Memory – ‘Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind’ Review

Posted on 19 March 2004 by Michael DeZubiria

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind posterOne of the things that has really surprised me about the movies that are coming out at the time of this writing is which ones are turning out to be good and which ones are turning out to be not so great. I haven’t seen all of them yet, but it’s pretty odd to me that the latest movie starring Jim Carrey – an actor who not too long ago seemed doomed to never rise above rubber-faced, low-brow slapstick comedy – is one of the best movies in theaters, and a remake of a classic horror film, Dawn of the Dead, is getting better reviews than the newest Tom Hanks movie. Luckily, the 2004 Dawn of the Dead is spectacular, so getting better reviews than The Ladykillers doesn’t speak badly of Tom Hanks’ latest effort.

Carrey plays Joel Barish, a man with difficulty not only in his relationships, but also in his overall interaction with other people. He lives such a lonely life that, by his own admission, he has a tendency to fall in love with any woman who shows him even the slightest bit of attention. Strangely enough, he happens to stumble into some sort of relationship with Clementine Kruczyinski (Kate Winslet), a woman who fits with someone like Joel about as well as Kate Winslet fits with a last name like Kruczyinski. Actually, I probably shouldn’t say that, since there is something of a discrepancy between my own last name and my appearance. But the point is that Joel and Clementine could not really be more opposite. Joel is introverted and shy, while Clementine is outgoing enough to pursue a friendship with him despite his behavior, which initially shows something of a fear of even talking to her.

While it’s true that they do not fit together in almost any way, it’s a lot of what makes their relationship endearing (and it also provides a lot of what makes the early souring of that relationship more believable). The first downturn of their relationship is first suggested as Joel goes to visit Clementine and she `acts’ like she had never even met him, and then it turns out that she has had him erased from her mind by this strange company that specializes in erasing painful or unwanted memories. Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet in Eternal SunshineShe has had him erased from her mind before the audience is told anything about this memory erasing company. Really the only thing turned upside down (besides Joel’s and Clementine’s respective grasps on reality) is that she wasn’t ACTING like she didn’t know him. She wasn’t acting at all.

When Joel figures out what’s going on, he decides to have Clementine erased from his own memory. I have a theory that he does this almost entirely for revenge against her, which may be part of the reason that he so desperately tries to call the whole thing off right in the middle of it. The larger reason being, however, that he has a better relationship with her in the cyberspace of his mind than he did in real life. Their interaction when they are physically together is much less pleasant than it is in Joel’s mind, which was also more than likely true before either of them ever went to have their memories erased. Joel has fallen in love with Clementine, and the fact that they turn out to be completely incompatible does not change his dedication to her or his determination to keep her. She, on the other hand, does not fall for every person who shows her any attention.Jim Carrey

Director Michel Gondry pays extraordinary attention to detail in his movie, probably the main thing that makes the psychological aspect of it so effective. He goes to great lengths to portray the cognitive experiences of memories and dreams as closely as possible to reality in the movie. Consider having a dream where you’re in the future and reading the newspaper. You may or may not have had a dream like this (I have), but what would happen is very clearly reflected by events in the movie. I dreamed once that I was reading a newspaper about the presidential election results in November 2004. There was a picture of the winner, a huge headline announcing who the American president would be for the next four years, and a lengthy story detailing the events of the election process. As I looked at the newspaper, I remember staring at it intently, unable to focus on the photographs or quite concentrate enough on the words to read the story. No matter how hard I looked, I couldn’t make out a single word or photograph.

Jim CarreyThe people around me in my dream were also discussing the election results, but their words were a jumble because my mind doesn’t know what to put there. All the information was right there in front of me in the newspaper, but my mind couldn’t focus on it because, since the event has not happened yet, I simply don’t know it, and this kind of dream is amazingly well depicted in the  movie. People’s faces are blurred and distorted because they have been erased from memory, and their voices have been reduced to meaningless noises. They are right there, but Joel can’t focus on them because his brain no longer has the file detailing what they look like. While I admit that this kind of mental experience may not be universal, it is extremely rare that I see a movie that so brilliantly reflects a common experience like this. Bravo.

The movie twists and turns and messes with chronological time so much that it is almost impossible to describe a chronological plot, but the primary focus of the film is on the workings of the human mind, as well as the vast importance that memories, both good and bad, have in our lives. Without memories, our lives are exactly like Joel finds his journal, just blank. It is a fascinating journey to watch Joel and Clementine racing through the labyrinth of his mind trying to outrun the company that is erasing the very world surrounding him.

Joel and Clementine experience a little glitch in the matrix.

Joel and Clementine experience a little glitch in the matrix.

The movie is similar to the one of the best films of 2003, Big Fish, in that so much of it takes place inside the mind, so anything is possible. The restrictions of reality do not necessarily apply to what director Michel Gondry can put in the movie. Joel and Clementine are both a little crazy, so anything could happen. I love it when movies are outrageous, especially when they justify their excesses.

Note: as you may or may not know, Jim Carrey is one of the most famous actors currently working, and several years ago was honored with a gold star engraved in the sidewalk of Hollywood Boulevard. And can you guess what he and his daughter inscribed with their own fingers in the wet cement below his name, in front of a huge crowd of fans and television cameras?

The Bean Meter

The Man.

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Little Man Tate gets lost in jungle for 26 years, comes back as Robin Williams – ‘Jumanji’ Review…

Posted on 17 March 1995 by Michael DeZubiria

It’s interesting to transport yourself back to late 1995 when Jumanji was released into theaters. The movie-going public was still waiting eagerly for another stupendous family adventure to follow Jurassic Park, which blew away audiences of all ages despite some grisly scenes. The badly disappointing Congo had been released earlier in the year but younger audiences were recently charmed by the animated adventures of Pocahontas, while more mature audiences were considering the implications of Outbreak and reminiscing with the brilliant re-creation of the 1960s in Apollo 13.

Teenage audiences (which included myself) were mostly still running around the high schools quoting Clueless or ranting and raving about the (now primitive) technological wonders of The Net (you can order pizza using a computer!!), although in my own circle of friends we were more interested in the techno-criminals in Hackers, the pure, unfiltered awesomeness of Seven and that amazing blonde who got naked in Species.

Oh, and I was ditching school on an almost daily basis with one of the owners of this very website and sneaking over to Fashion Island to watch Ace Ventura over and over.

Sadly, Jumanji was a definite step backwards in almost all adventure movie departments. The special effects more than anything else are a conspicuous regression, but the biggest problem is that the effects sequences themselves are so disjointed from the rest of the movie.

It all starts with a quick sequence taking place in 1869 where two kids bury a magical board game called Jumanji in a wooden chest in the woods. This is about the extent of our knowledge of the game, by the way. There is a whole other movie that takes place before this one begins, without which Jumanji is left with a gaping plot hole. But no matter, the important thing is that this is a board game is so hellacious and fearsome that the kids fear for the soul of anyone who happens to dig it up in the future. No word on why they didn’t just burn it.

Cut to 1969, where a young boy named Alan Parrish happens upon the chest at the site where his father is overseeing the construction of his shoe factory. He takes it home and plays a game with his friend Sarah. The game pieces snap into position without being touched and move themselves once the dice are rolled, but even more amazing are the physical manifestations of dangerous safari creatures and other mayhem conjured up by the game. After Alan and Sarah have each taken a turn (Alan’s even accidentally), Alas has been sucked off into Jumanji, wherever that is, and Sarah has taken off down the street, pursued by a squeaking mass of bats.

Then we jump ahead again, this time 26 years into the future to the modern day (1995). The house has been empty for years and a new family is moving in. The two adopted kids, Judy (a young Kirsten Dunst) and Peter find the game and begin to play, opening the door to Jumanji and bringing back things like lions and monkeys and Alan Parrish, now a grown, hairy man without the benefit of any human contact for the vast majority of his life. It turns out that the only way to stop the black magic of the game is to get to the end and say “Jumanji.” And since Alan and Sarah were in the middle of an unfinished game for all of those years, they are now in the middle of a four-person game with Judy and Peter and they must all take their respective turns until someone makes it to the end.

Man-eating floors not included.

Man-eating floors not included.

Sarah, of course, has suffered a life of diminished credibility ever since she claimed that Alan disappeared into a board game when she was a child. So much for the truth setting you free!
The movie is structured as a series of special effects sequences involving whatever dangerous manifestation results from each person’s turn rolling the dice. They all scramble frantically in the face of new dangers every ten or fifteen minutes or so, then the dangers disappear neatly for the next person to take their turn, and so on until the end of the movie. It’s not exactly the most imaginative structuring going on here, but I will admit that the ending has a little twist that, while it includes one of the cheapest happy Hollywood copout moves in movies (they also pulled the same thing in Click), I would be lying if I said it wasn’t at least a little heartwarming.

The young Alan Parrish's father later appears out of Jumanji as this safari hunter. We never learn why...

The young Alan Parrish's father later re-appears out of Jumanji as this safari hunter. We never learn why.

Unfortunately, a lot of the movie is geared toward kids around 10 years old, the same age as the kids in the movie, but it also contains some imagery and some situations that kids that age would find much too frightening or intense.  There is a scene involving giant spiders that admittedly look like nothing other than big plastic spider-puppets but that is still just as creepy as anything in Arachnophobia. So beware if you have a fear of creepy crawlies!

I would be lying if I said the movie wasn’t at all fun or entertaining. The story is told in an unconventional way, but it’s also true that it’s an unconventional story, which at least makes it a little more interesting. But in retrospect it’s a little hard to get over how perfectly everything is arranged as a setup for the ending. The relationships between Alan and Sarah and between the two of them and the other two kids who, needless to say, are orphans, will seem a little too perfect for some people. The characters are not uninteresting and the performances are satisfactory, but unfortunately they all take second billing to an ambitious special effects team that doesn’t seem to know when their half-baked digital creations are helping to drive the movie along and when they’re just swallowing everything else up.

2.5 Beans out of 5.

2.5 Beans out of 5.

Comments (2)